18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
Hankook
Ventus Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
5
5
4
24
3
5
Best position
#11
#1
#2
#1
#2
#1
Average position
17.0
2.8
3.3
2.7
3.7
2.2
Latest test
2021
2026
2026
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
32
139
40
151
36
63

Wet

Wet
Viking Fourtech
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Wet handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Wet circle cornering
Viking Fourtech
55%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%

Snow

Snow
Viking Fourtech
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Snow braking
Viking Fourtech
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
90%
Snow cornering
Viking Fourtech
67%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
93%
Snow handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Snow traction
Viking Fourtech
51%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%

Costs

Costs
Viking Fourtech
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Mileage
Viking Fourtech
65%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Price/value
Viking Fourtech
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Rolling resistance
Viking Fourtech
96%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%

Comfort

Comfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Viking Fourtech
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Comfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Dry

Dry
Viking Fourtech
59%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison