18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

In this comparative review, we compare two all-round tyres, the Viking Fourtech and the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750, focusing on individual and mutual test results, strengths, and weaknesses.


The Viking Fourtech, manufactured by Viking, lags slightly behind in the tests with an overall rating of 29%. Despite its lower rating, it demonstrates strengths in aquaplaning behavior and low rolling resistance, making it a decent budget-friendly and eco-conscious choice. However, its overall rating suggests there may be better options available on the market if the priority lies in areas outside of these strengths.


On the other hand, the Kinergy 4S2 H750 is a newer model from Hankook, replacing the previous Hankook Kinergy 4S model. With an overall rating of 81%, it significantly surpasses the Viking Fourtech. Its strengths lie in handling on both wet and snowy surfaces, with a good grip and impressive aquaplaning reserves. This tyre delivers superior performance, optimizing safety and ensuring excellent handling during different seasons.


Looking into specific test results, Autobild's comparison ranks the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 fourth out of 27 tyres tested. On the other hand, the Viking Fourtech falls behind, placing 15th. The Kinergy 4S2 H750 clearly outperforms the Fourtech, with better performance in aquaplaning - both cross and longitudinal, wet handling, and snow handling.


According to Autobild's 2020 review, the Kinergy 4S2 H750 makes a significant impression with excellent performance on wet surfaces and noteworthy snow capabilities. Its short braking distances on both dry and wet roads and excellent aquaplaning reserves further reinforce its reliability. However, the review mentions average longevity and satisfactory comfort as areas of slight compromise.


In conclusion, it is clear that while both tyres have their competent features, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 outperforms the Viking Fourtech in most aspects, making it the better choice of the two for most drivers. Hankook's higher rating, better test performance, and its ability to replace an older model demonstrate the quality and commitment the manufacturer has in offering high-performing tyres. The stability, grip, and handling of the Kinergy 4S2 H750 makes it worth considering, especially for drivers who frequently encounter wet or snowy conditions.

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
Hankook
Kinergy 4S2 H750
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Number of tests
5
20
24
Best position
#11
#1
#1
Average position
17.0
4.7
2.7
Latest test
2021
2025
2025
Available sizes
32
135
151

Performance comparison

Wet Performance
Viking Fourtech
72%
Viking
Fourtech
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Hankook
Kinergy 4S2 H750
Michelin CrossClimate 2
68%
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Wet Braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
63%
Wet Handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
59%
Wet Circle Cornering
Viking Fourtech
55%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
63%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Viking Fourtech
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Aquaplaning Cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
71%
Dry Performance
Viking Fourtech
59%
Viking
Fourtech
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Hankook
Kinergy 4S2 H750
Michelin CrossClimate 2
94%
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Dry Braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
100%
Dry Handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
88%
Snow Performance
Viking Fourtech
68%
Viking
Fourtech
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Hankook
Kinergy 4S2 H750
Michelin CrossClimate 2
85%
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Snow Braking
Viking Fourtech
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Snow Traction
Viking Fourtech
51%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
96%
Snow Handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Snow Circle Cornering
Viking Fourtech
67%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Comfort & Noise
Viking Fourtech
71%
Viking
Fourtech
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Hankook
Kinergy 4S2 H750
Michelin CrossClimate 2
71%
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Noise Exterior
Viking Fourtech
76%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
76%
Ride Comfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
66%
Economy
Viking Fourtech
81%
Viking
Fourtech
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Hankook
Kinergy 4S2 H750
Michelin CrossClimate 2
81%
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Rolling Resistance
Viking Fourtech
96%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
96%
Mileage
Viking Fourtech
65%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
65%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
All season
2021225/50 R17View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison