Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Vredestein Quatrac vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Budget

Viking

Fourtech

R13 – R19

VS

Upper-middle

Hankook

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Fourtech

ION FlexClimate

Quatrac

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Number of tests

5

1

16

3

5

Best position

#11

#1

#2

#1

Average position

17.0

1.0

3.1

3.7

2.2

Latest test

2021

2025

Available sizes

32

27

86

34

63

Wet

Viking Fourtech

70%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Vredestein Quatrac

87%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Wet braking

Viking Fourtech

71%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Vredestein Quatrac

86%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Wet circle cornering

Viking Fourtech

55%

Vredestein Quatrac

88%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Wet handling

Viking Fourtech

59%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Vredestein Quatrac

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Aquaplaning - cross

Viking Fourtech

96%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Vredestein Quatrac

82%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Viking Fourtech

77%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

95%

Vredestein Quatrac

84%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Snow

Viking Fourtech

71%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

75%

Vredestein Quatrac

81%

Snow braking

Viking Fourtech

82%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

78%

Vredestein Quatrac

84%

Snow cornering

Viking Fourtech

67%

Vredestein Quatrac

74%

Snow handling

Viking Fourtech

71%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

71%

Vredestein Quatrac

83%

Snow traction

Viking Fourtech

51%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

76%

Vredestein Quatrac

79%

Costs

Viking Fourtech

84%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Vredestein Quatrac

67%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Rolling resistance

Viking Fourtech

96%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Vredestein Quatrac

77%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Mileage

Viking Fourtech

65%

Vredestein Quatrac

56%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Price/value

Viking Fourtech

77%

Vredestein Quatrac

64%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Dry

Viking Fourtech

59%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Vredestein Quatrac

82%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Dry handling

Viking Fourtech

71%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Vredestein Quatrac

81%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Dry braking

Viking Fourtech

47%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Vredestein Quatrac

79%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Comfort

Viking Fourtech

76%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

78%

Vredestein Quatrac

88%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Exterior noise

Viking Fourtech

76%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

81%

Vredestein Quatrac

86%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Comfort

Viking Fourtech

66%

Vredestein Quatrac

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Vredestein Quatrac vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Fourtech

ION FlexClimate

Quatrac

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Costs

Dry

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison