18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Number of tests
5
1
3
2
Best position
#11
#1
#2
#1
Average position
17.0
1.0
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2021
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
32
64
34
23

Wet

Wet
Viking Fourtech
70%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Wet handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%

Snow

Snow
Viking Fourtech
71%

Costs

Costs
Viking Fourtech
84%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Rolling resistance
Viking Fourtech
96%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Exterior noise
Viking Fourtech
76%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%

Dry

Dry
Viking Fourtech
59%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Dry handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison