18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. GT RADIAL ClimateActive vs. Pirelli Cinturato (C3) vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
GT
RADIAL ClimateActive
Pirelli
Cinturato (C3)
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
5
3
4
3
Best position
#11
#5
#1
#2
Average position
17.0
7.3
3.3
3.7
Latest test
2021
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
32
1
34

Wet

Wet
Viking Fourtech
70%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
94%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
70%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
89%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
100%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
68%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
94%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Snow

Snow
Viking Fourtech
71%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
73%

Costs

Costs
Viking Fourtech
84%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
69%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
87%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Viking Fourtech
96%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
87%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dry

Dry
Viking Fourtech
59%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
100%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
71%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
100%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
100%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
89%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Viking Fourtech
76%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison