18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. GT RADIAL ClimateActive vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
GT
RADIAL ClimateActive
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
5
3
3
Best position
#11
#5
#2
Average position
17.0
7.3
3.3
Latest test
2021
2025
2026
Available sizes
32
1
60

Wet

Wet
Viking Fourtech
70%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Wet circle cornering
Viking Fourtech
55%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Wet handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%

Snow

Snow
Viking Fourtech
71%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
73%

Costs

Costs
Viking Fourtech
84%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Mileage
Viking Fourtech
65%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
53%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Price/value
Viking Fourtech
77%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
56%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Viking Fourtech
96%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%

Comfort

Comfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Exterior noise
Viking Fourtech
76%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%

Dry

Dry
Viking Fourtech
59%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Dry handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison