Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. GT RADIAL ClimateActive vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Budget

Viking

Fourtech

R13 – R19

VS

Budget

GT

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Fourtech

RADIAL ClimateActive

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Number of tests

5

3

5

Best position

#11

#5

#2

#1

Average position

17.0

7.3

3.3

3.7

2.2

Latest test

2021

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

32

1

40

60

34

63

Wet

Viking Fourtech

70%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Aquaplaning - cross

Viking Fourtech

96%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Viking Fourtech

77%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Wet braking

Viking Fourtech

71%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Wet circle cornering

Viking Fourtech

55%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Wet handling

Viking Fourtech

59%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Snow

Viking Fourtech

71%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

73%

Costs

Viking Fourtech

84%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Rolling resistance

Viking Fourtech

96%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Mileage

Viking Fourtech

65%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

53%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Comfort

Viking Fourtech

76%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Exterior noise

Viking Fourtech

76%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Dry

Viking Fourtech

59%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Dry braking

Viking Fourtech

47%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Dry handling

Viking Fourtech

71%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. GT RADIAL ClimateActive vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Fourtech

RADIAL ClimateActive

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Ventus Evo

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Costs

Comfort

Dry

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison