18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. GT RADIAL ClimateActive vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
GT
RADIAL ClimateActive
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
5
3
3
Best position
#11
#5
#2
Average position
17.0
7.3
3.7
Latest test
2021
2025
2025
Available sizes
32
1
34

Wet

Wet
Viking Fourtech
70%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
68%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
70%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Viking Fourtech
55%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
85%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Falken e.Ziex
61%

Snow

Snow
Viking Fourtech
71%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
73%

Costs

Costs
Viking Fourtech
84%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
69%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Viking Fourtech
96%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Viking Fourtech
65%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
53%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Price/value
Viking Fourtech
77%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
56%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Comfort

Comfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Viking Fourtech
76%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Viking Fourtech
59%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
71%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison