Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. GT RADIAL ClimateActive vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Budget

Viking

Fourtech

R13 – R19

VS

Budget

GT

Also compare with

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 S

Test Profile

Fourtech

RADIAL ClimateActive

Advantage

Ventus Evo

Number of tests

5

3

14

3

Best position

#11

#5

#8

#2

Average position

17.0

7.3

13.4

3.3

Latest test

2021

2025

2026

Available sizes

32

1

153

60

Wet

Viking Fourtech

70%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

74%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Wet handling

Viking Fourtech

59%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - cross

Viking Fourtech

96%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Viking Fourtech

77%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

68%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Wet braking

Viking Fourtech

71%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

70%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Wet circle cornering

Viking Fourtech

55%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Snow

Viking Fourtech

71%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

73%

Costs

Viking Fourtech

84%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

69%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Mileage

Viking Fourtech

65%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

53%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Price/value

Viking Fourtech

77%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

56%

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Rolling resistance

Viking Fourtech

96%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

80%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Comfort

Viking Fourtech

76%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Exterior noise

Viking Fourtech

76%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Comfort

Viking Fourtech

66%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Dry

Viking Fourtech

59%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Dry braking

Viking Fourtech

47%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Dry handling

Viking Fourtech

71%

GT RADIAL ClimateActive

74%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. GT RADIAL ClimateActive vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Fourtech

RADIAL ClimateActive

Advantage

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Costs

Comfort

Dry

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison