18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. GT RADIAL ClimateActive vs. BFGoodrich Advantage

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
GT
RADIAL ClimateActive
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Number of tests
5
3
14
Best position
#11
#5
#8
Average position
17.0
7.3
13.4
Latest test
2021
2025
2026
Available sizes
32
1
153

Wet

Wet
Viking Fourtech
70%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Wet circle cornering
Viking Fourtech
55%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Wet handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%

Snow

Snow
Viking Fourtech
71%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
73%

Costs

Costs
Viking Fourtech
84%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Rolling resistance
Viking Fourtech
96%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Mileage
Viking Fourtech
65%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
53%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Price/value
Viking Fourtech
77%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
56%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%

Comfort

Comfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Comfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Exterior noise
Viking Fourtech
76%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%

Dry

Dry
Viking Fourtech
59%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Dry handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison