18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. GT RADIAL ClimateActive

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Viking) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT). Generally, GT allround tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Viking (56%). The first tyre test of Viking Fourtech was done in 2018, compared to 2024 when was the GT RADIAL ClimateActive first tested.

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
GT
RADIAL ClimateActive
Number of tests
5
3
Best position
#11
#5
Average position
17.0
7.3
Latest test
2021
2025
Available sizes
32
1

Wet

Wet
Viking Fourtech
70%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
70%
Wet circle cornering
Viking Fourtech
55%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
85%
Wet handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
68%

Snow

Snow
Viking Fourtech
71%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
73%
Snow braking
Viking Fourtech
82%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
84%
Snow cornering
Viking Fourtech
67%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
66%
Snow handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
66%
Snow traction
Viking Fourtech
51%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
75%

Costs

Costs
Viking Fourtech
84%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
69%
Rolling resistance
Viking Fourtech
96%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
80%
Mileage
Viking Fourtech
65%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
53%
Price/value
Viking Fourtech
77%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
56%

Comfort

Comfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Exterior noise
Viking Fourtech
76%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
78%

Dry

Dry
Viking Fourtech
59%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
72%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
71%
Dry handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
GT RADIAL ClimateActive
74%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison