18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
5
23
3
24
26
Best position
#11
#1
#2
#1
#1
Average position
17.0
3.3
3.7
2.7
2.2
Latest test
2021
2025
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
32
176
34
302
66

Wet

Wet
Viking Fourtech
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Wet circle cornering
Viking Fourtech
55%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Wet handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%

Snow

Snow
Viking Fourtech
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Snow cornering
Viking Fourtech
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Snow handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
62%
Snow traction
Viking Fourtech
51%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Snow braking
Viking Fourtech
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%

Costs

Costs
Viking Fourtech
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Price/value
Viking Fourtech
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Rolling resistance
Viking Fourtech
96%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Mileage
Viking Fourtech
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Exterior noise
Viking Fourtech
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Comfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%

Dry

Dry
Viking Fourtech
59%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison