18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Viking Fourtech

Viking

Fourtech

VS

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

Falken e.Ziex

Falken

e.Ziex

Dunlop Winter

Dunlop

Winter

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

Also compare with

WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

Viking

Fourtech

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

Falken

e.Ziex

Dunlop

Winter

Bridgestone

Blizzak 6

Number of tests

5

23

3

2

14

Best position

#11

#1

#2

#1

#1

Average position

17.0

3.3

3.7

1.5

3.6

Latest test

2021

2025

2025

2025

2025

Available sizes

32

176

34

65

188

Wet

Wet

Viking Fourtech

70%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Wet handling

Viking Fourtech

59%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Dunlop Winter

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Aquaplaning - cross

Viking Fourtech

96%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Viking Fourtech

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Dunlop Winter

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Wet braking

Viking Fourtech

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Wet circle cornering

Viking Fourtech

55%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Dunlop Winter

63%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Snow

Snow

Viking Fourtech

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

Snow cornering

Viking Fourtech

67%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

88%

Dunlop Winter

96%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Snow handling

Viking Fourtech

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Dunlop Winter

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

Snow traction

Viking Fourtech

51%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Dunlop Winter

96%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

74%

Snow braking

Viking Fourtech

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Costs

Costs

Viking Fourtech

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Dunlop Winter

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Mileage

Viking Fourtech

65%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

Price/value

Viking Fourtech

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

69%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Rolling resistance

Viking Fourtech

96%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dunlop Winter

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

Comfort

Comfort

Viking Fourtech

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Exterior noise

Viking Fourtech

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Comfort

Viking Fourtech

66%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

79%

Dry

Dry

Viking Fourtech

59%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dunlop Winter

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Dry braking

Viking Fourtech

47%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

Dry handling

Viking Fourtech

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dunlop Winter

64%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison