Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Budget

Viking

Fourtech

R13 – R19

VS

Premium

GoodYear

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Fourtech

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION FlexClimate

P ZERO PZ4

Ventus Evo

e.Ziex

Number of tests

5

3

1

14

3

Best position

#11

#2

#1

#2

Average position

17.0

3.3

1.0

5.5

3.3

3.7

Latest test

2021

2026

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

32

40

27

706

60

34

Wet

Viking Fourtech

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

83%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet braking

Viking Fourtech

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet circle cornering

Viking Fourtech

55%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

89%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet handling

Viking Fourtech

59%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

90%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

Viking Fourtech

96%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

68%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Viking Fourtech

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

95%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

76%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Snow

Viking Fourtech

71%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

75%

Costs

Viking Fourtech

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

52%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Viking Fourtech

96%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

59%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

Viking Fourtech

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

49%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dry

Viking Fourtech

59%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Viking Fourtech

47%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Viking Fourtech

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

82%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Comfort

Viking Fourtech

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

78%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Viking Fourtech

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

81%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Fourtech

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION FlexClimate

P ZERO PZ4

Ventus Evo

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Costs

Dry

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison