18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Pirelli
P Zero Winter 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Number of tests
5
3
23
2
17
Best position
#11
#2
#1
#1
#1
Average position
17.0
3.3
3.3
2.0
1.7
Latest test
2021
2026
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
32
40
176
48
80

Wet

Wet
Viking Fourtech
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Wet circle cornering
Viking Fourtech
55%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Wet handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
13%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
59%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%

Snow

Snow
Viking Fourtech
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Snow braking
Viking Fourtech
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Snow cornering
Viking Fourtech
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Snow handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Snow traction
Viking Fourtech
51%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%

Costs

Costs
Viking Fourtech
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
84%
Rolling resistance
Viking Fourtech
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Mileage
Viking Fourtech
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
83%
Price/value
Viking Fourtech
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%

Dry

Dry
Viking Fourtech
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Dry handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%

Comfort

Comfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Exterior noise
Viking Fourtech
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Comfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison