18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Dunlop
Winter
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
5
3
2
14
24
3
Best position
#11
#2
#1
#1
#1
#2
Average position
17.0
3.3
1.5
3.6
2.7
3.7
Latest test
2021
2026
2025
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
32
40
65
188
302
34

Wet

Wet
Viking Fourtech
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet circle cornering
Viking Fourtech
55%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Dunlop Winter
63%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
86%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Dunlop Winter
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Dunlop Winter
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Snow

Snow
Viking Fourtech
71%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Snow braking
Viking Fourtech
82%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Snow cornering
Viking Fourtech
67%
Dunlop Winter
96%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Snow handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Dunlop Winter
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
62%
Snow traction
Viking Fourtech
51%
Dunlop Winter
96%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%

Costs

Costs
Viking Fourtech
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Dunlop Winter
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Viking Fourtech
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Price/value
Viking Fourtech
77%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rolling resistance
Viking Fourtech
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Dunlop Winter
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dry

Dry
Viking Fourtech
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dunlop Winter
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Dunlop Winter
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Viking Fourtech
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison