Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex

Budget

Viking

Fourtech

R13 – R19

VS

Premium

GoodYear

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Fourtech

Efficientgrip Performance 2

AllSeasonContact 2

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Number of tests

5

3

17

5

3

Best position

#11

#2

#1

#2

Average position

17.0

3.3

2.5

2.2

3.7

Latest test

2021

2026

2025

Available sizes

32

40

284

63

34

Wet

Viking Fourtech

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental AllSeasonContact 2

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet braking

Viking Fourtech

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Continental AllSeasonContact 2

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet circle cornering

Viking Fourtech

55%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Continental AllSeasonContact 2

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet handling

Viking Fourtech

59%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Continental AllSeasonContact 2

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

Viking Fourtech

96%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Continental AllSeasonContact 2

73%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Viking Fourtech

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Continental AllSeasonContact 2

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Snow

Viking Fourtech

71%

Continental AllSeasonContact 2

82%

Snow braking

Viking Fourtech

82%

Continental AllSeasonContact 2

81%

Snow cornering

Viking Fourtech

67%

Continental AllSeasonContact 2

92%

Snow handling

Viking Fourtech

71%

Continental AllSeasonContact 2

84%

Snow traction

Viking Fourtech

51%

Continental AllSeasonContact 2

77%

Costs

Viking Fourtech

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Continental AllSeasonContact 2

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Viking Fourtech

96%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Continental AllSeasonContact 2

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

Viking Fourtech

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Continental AllSeasonContact 2

73%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Price/value

Viking Fourtech

77%

Continental AllSeasonContact 2

55%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Comfort

Viking Fourtech

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Continental AllSeasonContact 2

1%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Viking Fourtech

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Continental AllSeasonContact 2

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Exterior noise

Viking Fourtech

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Continental AllSeasonContact 2

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dry

Viking Fourtech

59%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental AllSeasonContact 2

86%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Viking Fourtech

47%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental AllSeasonContact 2

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Viking Fourtech

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental AllSeasonContact 2

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex

Fourtech

Efficientgrip Performance 2

AllSeasonContact 2

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Costs

Comfort

Dry

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison