Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Dunlop Winter

Budget

Viking

Fourtech

R13 – R19

VS

Premium

Goodyear

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

Fourtech

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

UltraGrip Performance+

e.Ziex

Winter

Number of tests

5

23

3

2

Best position

#11

#1

#2

#1

Average position

17.0

2.2

3.3

3.7

1.5

Latest test

2021

2025

Available sizes

32

63

176

34

65

Wet

Viking Fourtech

70%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Wet braking

Viking Fourtech

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Wet circle cornering

Viking Fourtech

55%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Dunlop Winter

63%

Wet handling

Viking Fourtech

59%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Dunlop Winter

67%

Aquaplaning - cross

Viking Fourtech

96%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Viking Fourtech

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Dunlop Winter

71%

Snow

Viking Fourtech

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Snow braking

Viking Fourtech

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Snow cornering

Viking Fourtech

67%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

88%

Dunlop Winter

96%

Snow handling

Viking Fourtech

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Dunlop Winter

79%

Snow traction

Viking Fourtech

51%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Dunlop Winter

96%

Costs

Viking Fourtech

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Dunlop Winter

83%

Rolling resistance

Viking Fourtech

96%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dunlop Winter

81%

Mileage

Viking Fourtech

65%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Price/value

Viking Fourtech

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

69%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Comfort

Viking Fourtech

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Comfort

Viking Fourtech

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Exterior noise

Viking Fourtech

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Dry

Viking Fourtech

59%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dunlop Winter

69%

Dry braking

Viking Fourtech

47%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Dry handling

Viking Fourtech

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dunlop Winter

64%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Dunlop Winter

Fourtech

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

UltraGrip Performance+

e.Ziex

Winter

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Costs

Comfort

Dry

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison