Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Budget

Viking

Fourtech

R13 – R19

VS

Premium

Goodyear

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Fourtech

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Roadhawk 2

CrossClimate 2

e.Ziex

Number of tests

5

6

24

3

Best position

#11

#1

#3

#1

#2

Average position

17.0

2.2

4.7

2.7

3.7

Latest test

2021

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

32

63

146

151

34

Wet

Viking Fourtech

70%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Viking Fourtech

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

Viking Fourtech

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet circle cornering

Viking Fourtech

55%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet handling

Viking Fourtech

59%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

Viking Fourtech

96%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Snow

Viking Fourtech

71%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Snow traction

Viking Fourtech

51%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Snow braking

Viking Fourtech

82%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

90%

Snow cornering

Viking Fourtech

67%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

93%

Snow handling

Viking Fourtech

71%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Costs

Viking Fourtech

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Price/value

Viking Fourtech

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

60%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

43%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Rolling resistance

Viking Fourtech

96%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

87%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

Viking Fourtech

65%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

38%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Comfort

Viking Fourtech

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Viking Fourtech

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

83%

Exterior noise

Viking Fourtech

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dry

Viking Fourtech

59%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

87%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Viking Fourtech

47%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Viking Fourtech

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Fourtech

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Roadhawk 2

CrossClimate 2

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Costs

Comfort

Dry

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison