Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Budget

Viking

Fourtech

R13 – R19

VS

Premium

Goodyear

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Cinturato All Season SF3

Test Profile

Fourtech

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Quadraxer 3

e.Ziex

UltraContact NXT

Number of tests

5

18

13

3

2

Best position

#11

#1

#4

#2

#1

Average position

17.0

6.1

6.3

3.7

1.0

Latest test

2021

2024

2025

Available sizes

32

47

111

34

23

Wet

Viking Fourtech

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

72%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Viking Fourtech

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

81%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Wet braking

Viking Fourtech

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

71%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Wet circle cornering

Viking Fourtech

55%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

70%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Wet handling

Viking Fourtech

59%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

64%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Aquaplaning - cross

Viking Fourtech

96%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

78%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Snow

Viking Fourtech

71%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

82%

Snow traction

Viking Fourtech

51%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

85%

Snow braking

Viking Fourtech

82%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

81%

Snow cornering

Viking Fourtech

67%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

87%

Snow handling

Viking Fourtech

71%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

78%

Costs

Viking Fourtech

84%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Price/value

Viking Fourtech

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

97%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

66%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Rolling resistance

Viking Fourtech

96%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

78%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Mileage

Viking Fourtech

65%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

64%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Comfort

Viking Fourtech

76%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Comfort

Viking Fourtech

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

90%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

78%

Exterior noise

Viking Fourtech

76%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

79%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Dry

Viking Fourtech

59%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

77%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Dry braking

Viking Fourtech

47%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Dry handling

Viking Fourtech

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Kleber Quadraxer 3

72%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Fourtech

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Quadraxer 3

e.Ziex

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Costs

Comfort

Dry

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison