Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Vredestein Quatrac

Budget

Viking

Fourtech

R13 – R19

VS

Premium

Goodyear

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Fourtech

Efficient Grip Performance 2

ION FlexClimate

e.Ziex

Quatrac

Number of tests

5

18

1

3

16

Best position

#11

#1

#2

#1

Average position

17.0

6.1

1.0

3.7

3.1

Latest test

2021

2024

2025

Available sizes

32

47

27

34

86

Wet

Viking Fourtech

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Vredestein Quatrac

87%

Wet braking

Viking Fourtech

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Vredestein Quatrac

86%

Wet circle cornering

Viking Fourtech

55%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Vredestein Quatrac

88%

Wet handling

Viking Fourtech

59%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Vredestein Quatrac

92%

Aquaplaning - cross

Viking Fourtech

96%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Vredestein Quatrac

82%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Viking Fourtech

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

95%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Vredestein Quatrac

84%

Snow

Viking Fourtech

71%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

75%

Vredestein Quatrac

81%

Snow braking

Viking Fourtech

82%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

78%

Vredestein Quatrac

84%

Snow cornering

Viking Fourtech

67%

Vredestein Quatrac

74%

Snow handling

Viking Fourtech

71%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

71%

Vredestein Quatrac

83%

Snow traction

Viking Fourtech

51%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

76%

Vredestein Quatrac

79%

Costs

Viking Fourtech

84%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Vredestein Quatrac

67%

Rolling resistance

Viking Fourtech

96%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Vredestein Quatrac

77%

Mileage

Viking Fourtech

65%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Vredestein Quatrac

56%

Price/value

Viking Fourtech

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

97%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Vredestein Quatrac

64%

Dry

Viking Fourtech

59%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Vredestein Quatrac

82%

Dry braking

Viking Fourtech

47%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Vredestein Quatrac

79%

Dry handling

Viking Fourtech

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Vredestein Quatrac

81%

Comfort

Viking Fourtech

76%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Vredestein Quatrac

88%

Exterior noise

Viking Fourtech

76%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Vredestein Quatrac

86%

Comfort

Viking Fourtech

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

90%

Vredestein Quatrac

78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Vredestein Quatrac

Fourtech

Efficient Grip Performance 2

ION FlexClimate

e.Ziex

Quatrac

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Costs

Dry

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison