18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
5
18
3
5
2
3
5
Best position
#11
#1
#2
#1
#1
#2
#1
Average position
17.0
6.1
3.3
2.2
1.0
3.7
2.2
Latest test
2021
2024
2026
2025
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
32
47
40
63
23
34
63

Wet

Wet
Viking Fourtech
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Wet handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Viking Fourtech
55%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Snow

Snow
Viking Fourtech
71%

Costs

Costs
Viking Fourtech
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Viking Fourtech
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Comfort

Comfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Dry

Dry
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison