Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Vredestein Quatrac

Budget

Viking

Fourtech

R13 – R19

VS

Premium

Goodyear

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Fourtech

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Ziex

ION FlexClimate

Quatrac

Number of tests

5

18

3

1

16

Best position

#11

#1

#2

#1

Average position

17.0

6.1

3.7

1.0

3.1

Latest test

2021

2024

2025

Available sizes

32

47

34

27

86

Wet

Viking Fourtech

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Vredestein Quatrac

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Viking Fourtech

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

95%

Vredestein Quatrac

84%

Wet braking

Viking Fourtech

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Vredestein Quatrac

86%

Wet circle cornering

Viking Fourtech

55%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Vredestein Quatrac

88%

Wet handling

Viking Fourtech

59%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Vredestein Quatrac

92%

Aquaplaning - cross

Viking Fourtech

96%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Vredestein Quatrac

82%

Snow

Viking Fourtech

71%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

75%

Vredestein Quatrac

81%

Snow traction

Viking Fourtech

51%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

76%

Vredestein Quatrac

79%

Snow braking

Viking Fourtech

82%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

78%

Vredestein Quatrac

84%

Snow cornering

Viking Fourtech

67%

Vredestein Quatrac

74%

Snow handling

Viking Fourtech

71%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

71%

Vredestein Quatrac

83%

Costs

Viking Fourtech

84%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Vredestein Quatrac

67%

Price/value

Viking Fourtech

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

97%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Vredestein Quatrac

64%

Rolling resistance

Viking Fourtech

96%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Vredestein Quatrac

77%

Mileage

Viking Fourtech

65%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Vredestein Quatrac

56%

Comfort

Viking Fourtech

76%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

78%

Vredestein Quatrac

88%

Comfort

Viking Fourtech

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

90%

Vredestein Quatrac

78%

Exterior noise

Viking Fourtech

76%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

81%

Vredestein Quatrac

86%

Dry

Viking Fourtech

59%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Vredestein Quatrac

82%

Dry braking

Viking Fourtech

47%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Vredestein Quatrac

79%

Dry handling

Viking Fourtech

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Vredestein Quatrac

81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Vredestein Quatrac

Fourtech

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Ziex

ION FlexClimate

Quatrac

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Costs

Comfort

Dry

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison