18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Number of tests
5
18
3
29
24
Best position
#11
#1
#2
#1
#1
Average position
17.0
6.1
3.7
3.7
2.7
Latest test
2021
2024
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
32
47
36
180
151
Confidence
Medium confidence

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Viking Fourtech
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Wet handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Wet circle cornering
Viking Fourtech
55%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Snow
Viking Fourtech
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Snow cornering
Viking Fourtech
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
93%
Snow handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
65%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Snow traction
Viking Fourtech
51%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Snow braking
Viking Fourtech
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
90%
Costs
Viking Fourtech
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Price/value
Viking Fourtech
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
49%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%
Rolling resistance
Viking Fourtech
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
92%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Mileage
Viking Fourtech
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
51%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Comfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Exterior noise
Viking Fourtech
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Comfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
83%
Dry
Viking Fourtech
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
88%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Dry handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store