18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Number of tests
5
6
3
2
Best position
#11
#3
#2
#1
Average position
17.0
4.7
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2021
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
32
146
34
23

Wet

Wet
Viking Fourtech
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Wet circle cornering
Viking Fourtech
55%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Wet handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%

Snow

Snow
Viking Fourtech
71%

Costs

Costs
Viking Fourtech
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Rolling resistance
Viking Fourtech
96%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%

Dry

Dry
Viking Fourtech
59%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Dry handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%

Comfort

Comfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Exterior noise
Viking Fourtech
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison