Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate

Budget

Viking

Fourtech

R13 – R19

VS

Upper-middle

Falken

e.Ziex

ION FlexClimate

9.0

R17 – R21

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Fourtech

e.Ziex

ION FlexClimate

Number of tests

5

3

1

Best position

#11

#2

#1

Average position

17.0

3.7

1.0

Latest test

2021

2025

Available sizes

32

34

27

Wet

Viking Fourtech

70%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Viking Fourtech

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

95%

Wet braking

Viking Fourtech

71%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Wet handling

Viking Fourtech

59%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Aquaplaning - cross

Viking Fourtech

96%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Snow

Viking Fourtech

71%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

75%

Costs

Viking Fourtech

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Rolling resistance

Viking Fourtech

96%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Comfort

Viking Fourtech

76%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

78%

Exterior noise

Viking Fourtech

76%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

81%

Dry

Viking Fourtech

59%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Dry braking

Viking Fourtech

47%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Dry handling

Viking Fourtech

71%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate

Fourtech

e.Ziex

ION FlexClimate

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Costs

Comfort

Dry

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison