Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Vredestein Quatrac

Budget

Viking

Fourtech

R13 – R19

VS

Upper-middle

Falken

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Fourtech

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Quatrac

Number of tests

5

3

5

16

Best position

#11

#2

#1

Average position

17.0

3.7

3.3

2.2

3.1

Latest test

2021

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

32

34

40

63

86

Wet

Viking Fourtech

70%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Vredestein Quatrac

87%

Wet braking

Viking Fourtech

71%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Vredestein Quatrac

86%

Wet circle cornering

Viking Fourtech

55%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Vredestein Quatrac

88%

Wet handling

Viking Fourtech

59%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Vredestein Quatrac

92%

Aquaplaning - cross

Viking Fourtech

96%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Vredestein Quatrac

82%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Viking Fourtech

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Vredestein Quatrac

84%

Snow

Viking Fourtech

71%

Vredestein Quatrac

81%

Snow braking

Viking Fourtech

82%

Vredestein Quatrac

84%

Snow cornering

Viking Fourtech

67%

Vredestein Quatrac

74%

Snow handling

Viking Fourtech

71%

Vredestein Quatrac

83%

Snow traction

Viking Fourtech

51%

Vredestein Quatrac

79%

Costs

Viking Fourtech

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Vredestein Quatrac

67%

Rolling resistance

Viking Fourtech

96%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Vredestein Quatrac

77%

Mileage

Viking Fourtech

65%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Vredestein Quatrac

56%

Price/value

Viking Fourtech

77%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Vredestein Quatrac

64%

Comfort

Viking Fourtech

76%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Vredestein Quatrac

88%

Comfort

Viking Fourtech

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Vredestein Quatrac

78%

Exterior noise

Viking Fourtech

76%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Vredestein Quatrac

86%

Dry

Viking Fourtech

59%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Vredestein Quatrac

82%

Dry braking

Viking Fourtech

47%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Vredestein Quatrac

79%

Dry handling

Viking Fourtech

71%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Vredestein Quatrac

81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Vredestein Quatrac

Fourtech

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Quatrac

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Costs

Comfort

Dry

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison