Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Budget

Viking

Fourtech

R13 – R19

VS

Upper-middle

Falken

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

Fourtech

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

UltraGrip Performance+

UltraContact NXT

Number of tests

5

3

5

23

2

Best position

#11

#2

#1

Average position

17.0

3.7

2.2

3.3

1.0

Latest test

2021

2025

Available sizes

32

34

63

176

23

Wet

Viking Fourtech

70%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Wet braking

Viking Fourtech

71%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Wet circle cornering

Viking Fourtech

55%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Wet handling

Viking Fourtech

59%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Aquaplaning - cross

Viking Fourtech

96%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Viking Fourtech

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Snow

Viking Fourtech

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Snow braking

Viking Fourtech

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Snow cornering

Viking Fourtech

67%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

88%

Snow handling

Viking Fourtech

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Snow traction

Viking Fourtech

51%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Costs

Viking Fourtech

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Rolling resistance

Viking Fourtech

96%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Mileage

Viking Fourtech

65%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Price/value

Viking Fourtech

77%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

69%

Dry

Viking Fourtech

59%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Dry braking

Viking Fourtech

47%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Dry handling

Viking Fourtech

71%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Comfort

Viking Fourtech

76%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Exterior noise

Viking Fourtech

76%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Comfort

Viking Fourtech

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Fourtech

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

UltraGrip Performance+

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Costs

Dry

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison