18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
5
2
3
Best position
#11
#1
#2
Average position
17.0
1.0
3.3
Latest test
2021
2025
2026
Available sizes
32
23
40

Wet

Wet
Viking Fourtech
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Wet circle cornering
Viking Fourtech
55%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Wet handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%

Snow

Snow
Viking Fourtech
71%

Costs

Costs
Viking Fourtech
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Rolling resistance
Viking Fourtech
96%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Mileage
Viking Fourtech
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Comfort

Comfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Exterior noise
Viking Fourtech
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Dry

Dry
Viking Fourtech
59%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Dry handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison