18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Continental AllSeasonContact vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
Continental
AllSeasonContact
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Number of tests
5
26
4
3
24
Best position
#11
#1
#2
#2
#1
Average position
17.0
4.2
3.3
3.7
2.7
Latest test
2021
2024
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
32
100
40
36
151

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Viking Fourtech
70%
Continental AllSeasonContact
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
Continental AllSeasonContact
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Wet circle cornering
Viking Fourtech
55%
Continental AllSeasonContact
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Wet handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
Continental AllSeasonContact
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
Continental AllSeasonContact
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
Continental AllSeasonContact
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Snow
Viking Fourtech
71%
Continental AllSeasonContact
88%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Snow braking
Viking Fourtech
82%
Continental AllSeasonContact
86%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
90%
Snow cornering
Viking Fourtech
67%
Continental AllSeasonContact
93%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
93%
Snow handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Continental AllSeasonContact
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Snow traction
Viking Fourtech
51%
Continental AllSeasonContact
84%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Costs
Viking Fourtech
84%
Continental AllSeasonContact
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Rolling resistance
Viking Fourtech
96%
Continental AllSeasonContact
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Mileage
Viking Fourtech
65%
Continental AllSeasonContact
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Price/value
Viking Fourtech
77%
Continental AllSeasonContact
63%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%
Comfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Continental AllSeasonContact
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Comfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
Continental AllSeasonContact
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
83%
Exterior noise
Viking Fourtech
76%
Continental AllSeasonContact
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Dry
Viking Fourtech
59%
Continental AllSeasonContact
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
Continental AllSeasonContact
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Dry handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Continental AllSeasonContact
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store