18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Bridgestone Potenza Sport vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Viking FourtechBudget
VikingViking

Fourtech

R13 – R19
Bridgestone Potenza SportPremium
BridgestoneBridgestone

Potenza Sport

8.7
R17 – R22
Hankook Ventus EvoPremium
HankookHankook

Ventus Evo

9.8
R17 – R22
Also compare with
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
Bridgestone
Potenza Sport
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
5
23
3
Best position
#11
#1
#2
Average position
17.0
3.3
3.3
Latest test
2021
2025
2026
Available sizes
32
188
60

Wet

Wet
Viking Fourtech
70%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Wet handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
93%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
86%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Wet circle cornering
Viking Fourtech
55%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
92%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%

Snow

Snow
Viking Fourtech
71%

Costs

Costs
Viking Fourtech
84%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Price/value
Viking Fourtech
77%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Viking Fourtech
96%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
58%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%

Comfort

Comfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Exterior noise
Viking Fourtech
76%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Comfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
79%

Dry

Dry
Viking Fourtech
59%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Dry handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison