18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Bridgestone Potenza Sport vs. Falken e.Ziex

Viking FourtechBudget
VikingViking

Fourtech

R13 – R19
Bridgestone Potenza SportPremium
BridgestoneBridgestone

Potenza Sport

8.7
R17 – R22
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Also compare with
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
Bridgestone
Potenza Sport
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
5
23
3
Best position
#11
#1
#2
Average position
17.0
3.3
3.7
Latest test
2021
2025
2025
Available sizes
32
188
34

Wet

Wet
Viking Fourtech
70%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
93%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
75%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
86%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Viking Fourtech
55%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Snow

Snow
Viking Fourtech
71%

Costs

Costs
Viking Fourtech
84%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
61%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Price/value
Viking Fourtech
77%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
63%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rolling resistance
Viking Fourtech
96%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
58%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Comfort

Comfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Viking Fourtech
76%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
79%

Dry

Dry
Viking Fourtech
59%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
88%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
88%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
85%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison