18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Michelin Primacy 5 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Viking FourtechBudget
VikingViking

Fourtech

R13 – R19
Bridgestone Blizzak 6Premium
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak 6

9.1
R16 – R22
Michelin Primacy 5Premium
MichelinMichelin

Primacy 5

8.4
R16 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Also compare with
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Michelin
Primacy 5
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
5
14
3
3
3
1
Best position
#11
#1
#1
#2
#2
#1
Average position
17.0
3.6
4.7
3.3
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2021
2025
2026
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
32
188
126
40
34
64

Wet

Wet
Viking Fourtech
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
58%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Michelin Primacy 5
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet circle cornering
Viking Fourtech
55%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%

Snow

Snow
Viking Fourtech
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Snow handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Snow traction
Viking Fourtech
51%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Snow braking
Viking Fourtech
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%

Costs

Costs
Viking Fourtech
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Viking Fourtech
96%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
Viking Fourtech
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Comfort

Comfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Comfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Exterior noise
Viking Fourtech
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Dry

Dry
Viking Fourtech
59%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Michelin Primacy 5
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison