Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Ceat WinterDrive vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Budget

Viking

Fourtech

R13 – R19

VS

Premium

Bridgestone

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

Fourtech

Blizzak 6

WinterDrive

WinterCraft WP52+

Number of tests

5

14

4

3

Best position

#11

#1

#10

#4

Average position

17.0

3.6

17.0

4.3

Latest test

2021

2025

Available sizes

32

188

37

97

Wet

Viking Fourtech

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Ceat WinterDrive

27%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

Wet handling

Viking Fourtech

59%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Ceat WinterDrive

51%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Aquaplaning - cross

Viking Fourtech

96%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Ceat WinterDrive

9%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Viking Fourtech

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Ceat WinterDrive

2%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Wet braking

Viking Fourtech

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Ceat WinterDrive

25%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Wet circle cornering

Viking Fourtech

55%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Ceat WinterDrive

55%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Snow

Viking Fourtech

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

Ceat WinterDrive

54%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Snow braking

Viking Fourtech

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Ceat WinterDrive

39%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

80%

Snow cornering

Viking Fourtech

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Ceat WinterDrive

71%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Snow handling

Viking Fourtech

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

Ceat WinterDrive

71%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Snow traction

Viking Fourtech

51%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

74%

Ceat WinterDrive

35%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

76%

Costs

Viking Fourtech

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Ceat WinterDrive

70%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

Mileage

Viking Fourtech

65%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Price/value

Viking Fourtech

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Ceat WinterDrive

92%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Rolling resistance

Viking Fourtech

96%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

Ceat WinterDrive

65%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Comfort

Viking Fourtech

76%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Ceat WinterDrive

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Exterior noise

Viking Fourtech

76%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Ceat WinterDrive

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Comfort

Viking Fourtech

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

79%

Ceat WinterDrive

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

68%

Dry

Viking Fourtech

59%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Ceat WinterDrive

73%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Dry braking

Viking Fourtech

47%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Dry handling

Viking Fourtech

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Ceat WinterDrive

73%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Ceat WinterDrive vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Fourtech

Blizzak 6

WinterDrive

WinterCraft WP52+

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Costs

Comfort

Dry

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison