18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
5
14
1
3
Best position
#11
#8
#1
#2
Average position
17.0
13.4
1.0
3.7
Latest test
2021
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
32
153
64
34

Wet

Wet
Viking Fourtech
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Viking Fourtech
55%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%

Snow

Snow
Viking Fourtech
71%

Costs

Costs
Viking Fourtech
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Viking Fourtech
96%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Viking Fourtech
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Price/value
Viking Fourtech
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Comfort

Comfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Viking Fourtech
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Viking Fourtech
59%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison