18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Michelin
CrossClimate 2
Number of tests
5
14
4
3
1
24
Best position
#11
#8
#2
#2
#1
#1
Average position
17.0
13.4
3.3
3.7
1.0
2.7
Latest test
2021
2026
2026
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
32
153
40
36
66
150

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Viking Fourtech
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
72%
Wet circle cornering
Viking Fourtech
55%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
77%
Wet handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
79%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
75%
Snow
Viking Fourtech
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Snow braking
Viking Fourtech
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
90%
Snow cornering
Viking Fourtech
67%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
93%
Snow handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Snow traction
Viking Fourtech
51%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Costs
Viking Fourtech
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
78%
Rolling resistance
Viking Fourtech
96%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Mileage
Viking Fourtech
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
74%
Price/value
Viking Fourtech
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
43%
Dry
Viking Fourtech
59%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
87%
Dry handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
82%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
92%
Comfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73%
Exterior noise
Viking Fourtech
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
84%
Comfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Michelin CrossClimate 2
83%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store