18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
5
14
3
3
Best position
#11
#8
#2
#2
Average position
17.0
13.4
3.7
3.3
Latest test
2021
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
32
153
34
60

Wet

Wet
Viking Fourtech
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Wet circle cornering
Viking Fourtech
55%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Wet handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Snow

Snow
Viking Fourtech
71%

Costs

Costs
Viking Fourtech
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Price/value
Viking Fourtech
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Viking Fourtech
96%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Mileage
Viking Fourtech
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Comfort

Comfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Exterior noise
Viking Fourtech
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%

Dry

Dry
Viking Fourtech
59%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Dry handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison