18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Falken e.Ziex

Viking Fourtech

Viking

Fourtech

VS

BFGoodrich Advantage

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Falken e.Ziex

Falken

e.Ziex

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Viking

Fourtech

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Falken

e.Ziex

Number of tests

5

14

3

Best position

#11

#8

#2

Average position

17.0

13.4

3.7

Latest test

2021

2026

2025

Available sizes

32

153

34

Wet

Wet

Viking Fourtech

70%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Viking Fourtech

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

Viking Fourtech

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet circle cornering

Viking Fourtech

55%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet handling

Viking Fourtech

59%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

Viking Fourtech

96%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Snow

Snow

Viking Fourtech

71%

Costs

Costs

Viking Fourtech

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Price/value

Viking Fourtech

77%

BFGoodrich Advantage

65%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Rolling resistance

Viking Fourtech

96%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

Viking Fourtech

65%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Comfort

Comfort

Viking Fourtech

76%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Viking Fourtech

66%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Exterior noise

Viking Fourtech

76%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dry

Dry

Viking Fourtech

59%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Viking Fourtech

47%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Viking Fourtech

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison