18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
5
14
26
Best position
#11
#8
#1
Average position
17.0
13.4
2.2
Latest test
2021
2026
2026
Available sizes
32
153
66

Wet

Wet
Viking Fourtech
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Wet handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Wet circle cornering
Viking Fourtech
55%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%

Snow

Snow
Viking Fourtech
71%

Costs

Costs
Viking Fourtech
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Mileage
Viking Fourtech
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Price/value
Viking Fourtech
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Rolling resistance
Viking Fourtech
96%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%

Comfort

Comfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Exterior noise
Viking Fourtech
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Comfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%

Dry

Dry
Viking Fourtech
59%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison