18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Viking Fourtech vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Test Profile

Viking
Fourtech
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Bridgestone
Potenza Sport
Number of tests
5
14
23
Best position
#11
#8
#1
Average position
17.0
13.4
3.3
Latest test
2021
2026
2025
Available sizes
32
153
188

Wet

Wet
Viking Fourtech
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
89%
Wet circle cornering
Viking Fourtech
55%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
92%
Wet handling
Viking Fourtech
59%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
93%
Aquaplaning - cross
Viking Fourtech
96%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Viking Fourtech
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
79%
Wet braking
Viking Fourtech
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
86%

Snow

Snow
Viking Fourtech
71%

Costs

Costs
Viking Fourtech
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
61%
Rolling resistance
Viking Fourtech
96%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
58%
Mileage
Viking Fourtech
65%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
85%
Price/value
Viking Fourtech
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
63%

Dry

Dry
Viking Fourtech
59%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
88%
Dry handling
Viking Fourtech
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
85%
Dry braking
Viking Fourtech
47%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Viking Fourtech
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
80%
Exterior noise
Viking Fourtech
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
70%
Comfort
Viking Fourtech
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
79%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison