18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Uniroyal RainSport 3 vs. BF Goodrich g-Grip vs. Falken Azenis FK510 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Yokohama Advan Fleva V701

Uniroyal RainSport 3 vs BF Goodrich g-Grip — test comparison


This comparison looks at two summer tyres regularly featured in tyre tests: the Uniroyal RainSport 3 and the BF Goodrich g-Grip. Both are positioned as mainstream summer tyres, but independent test results show a clear difference in relative performance. You can find the manufacturers here: Uniroyal and BF Goodrich.


Test summary (AutoBild): in the AutoBild group test of 50 summer tyres the RainSport 3 finished 4th out of 50, while the BF Goodrich g‑Grip placed 18th out of 50. Neither model in our dataset shows a newer replacement model listed, so there is no replacement link to report.


What the positions tell you


  • The Uniroyal RainSport 3’s top‑5 finish (4/50) indicates it performed very strongly overall in the test battery — a result typical of tyres that combine confident wet handling, short braking distances and stable aquaplaning resistance. A 4th place in a 50‑tyre field is a clear sign of competitive wet performance for a summer tyre.

  • The BF Goodrich g‑Grip’s mid‑pack finish (18/50) indicates a reliable all‑rounder but one that was outperformed by several competitors in critical test areas. Mid table typically reflects acceptable dry performance and comfort, but weaker relative results in the most demanding wet or high‑speed handling assessments.


Strengths & weaknesses — Uniroyal RainSport 3


  • Strengths: High test ranking suggests excellent wet braking and handling, good directional stability and effective water evacuation — key attributes for a summer tyre prioritised for safety in wet conditions.

  • Weaknesses: High-performing wet tyres sometimes compromise slightly on rolling resistance or longevity versus economy‑focused tyres; also a top test placing can come with a premium price versus mid‑tier alternatives.


Strengths & weaknesses — BF Goodrich g‑Grip


  • Strengths: A solid mid‑table result points to dependable behaviour in everyday driving — balanced dry handling, comfort and potentially good value for money.

  • Weaknesses: The 18th place finish shows it was beaten by many rivals in the same test set; that usually means longer wet braking distances or less refined aquaplaning resistance compared with the top performers.


Overall verdict
Based on the AutoBild results, the Uniroyal RainSport 3 is the stronger tyre in comparative tests, with a clear advantage over the BF Goodrich g‑Grip (4th vs 18th out of 50). If you prioritise top wet performance and high test rankings, the RainSport 3 is the better pick. If you want a more budget‑friendly, balanced summer tyre and can accept a mid‑pack test position, the g‑Grip remains a reasonable choice.


For product pages and manufacturer details: Uniroyal — manufacturer, tyre page RainSport 3; BF Goodrich — manufacturer, tyre page g‑Grip.

Test Profile

Uniroyal
RainSport 3
BF
Goodrich g-Grip
Falken
Azenis FK510
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Yokohama
Advan Fleva V701
Number of tests
8
6
29
36
4
Best position
#4
#6
#1
#1
#14
Average position
12.0
19.3
5.4
3.1
16.0
Latest test
2020
2019
2022
2023
2019
Available sizes
110
2
125
296
49

Wet

Wet
Uniroyal RainSport 3
58%
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
Falken Azenis FK510
81%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
84%
Wet side guide
Uniroyal RainSport 3
46%
Falken Azenis FK510
67%
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Uniroyal RainSport 3
73%
BF Goodrich g-Grip
87%
Falken Azenis FK510
79%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
85%
Wet braking
Uniroyal RainSport 3
56%
Falken Azenis FK510
87%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Wet handling
Uniroyal RainSport 3
46%
BF Goodrich g-Grip
89%
Falken Azenis FK510
83%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
88%
Aquaplaning - cross
Uniroyal RainSport 3
71%
BF Goodrich g-Grip
78%
Falken Azenis FK510
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
80%

Costs

Costs
Uniroyal RainSport 3
85%
BF Goodrich g-Grip
71%
Falken Azenis FK510
69%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
62%
Price/value
Uniroyal RainSport 3
84%
BF Goodrich g-Grip
68%
Falken Azenis FK510
81%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
35%
Rolling resistance
Uniroyal RainSport 3
88%
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Falken Azenis FK510
64%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
69%
Mileage
Uniroyal RainSport 3
78%
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
Falken Azenis FK510
69%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
60%

Comfort

Comfort
Uniroyal RainSport 3
76%
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Falken Azenis FK510
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
95%
Comfort
Uniroyal RainSport 3
61%
Falken Azenis FK510
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
71%
Exterior noise
Uniroyal RainSport 3
76%
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Falken Azenis FK510
76%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
95%

Dry

Dry
Uniroyal RainSport 3
57%
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Falken Azenis FK510
74%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
96%
Dry braking
Uniroyal RainSport 3
58%
Falken Azenis FK510
80%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Dry handling
Uniroyal RainSport 3
55%
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Falken Azenis FK510
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Yokohama Advan Fleva V701
96%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2019225/45 R17View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2017225/50 R17View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison