Comparison: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Upper-middle

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

R13 – R19

VS

Budget

Sava

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

MS plus 77

Eskimo HP2

UltraGrip Performance+

Blizzak LM-005

Number of tests

19

15

23

49

Best position

#3

#6

#1

Average position

11.2

15.5

3.3

3.2

Latest test

2021

2025

2024

Available sizes

76

28

176

213

Performance comparison

Wet Performance

82%

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

70%

Sava

Eskimo HP2

94%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

Wet Braking

Uniroyal MS plus 77

81%

Sava Eskimo HP2

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

92%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

97%

Wet Handling

Uniroyal MS plus 77

79%

Sava Eskimo HP2

63%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

95%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

Wet Circle Cornering

Uniroyal MS plus 77

84%

Sava Eskimo HP2

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

95%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

Aquaplaning Longitudinal

Uniroyal MS plus 77

79%

Sava Eskimo HP2

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

Aquaplaning Cross

Uniroyal MS plus 77

87%

Sava Eskimo HP2

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

97%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Dry Performance

83%

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

72%

Sava

Eskimo HP2

86%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

Dry Braking

Uniroyal MS plus 77

81%

Sava Eskimo HP2

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

87%

Dry Handling

Uniroyal MS plus 77

84%

Sava Eskimo HP2

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

Snow Performance

84%

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

89%

Sava

Eskimo HP2

91%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

Snow Braking

Uniroyal MS plus 77

92%

Sava Eskimo HP2

97%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

97%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

92%

Snow Traction

Uniroyal MS plus 77

81%

Sava Eskimo HP2

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

97%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

76%

Snow Handling

Uniroyal MS plus 77

81%

Sava Eskimo HP2

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

76%

Snow Circle Cornering

Uniroyal MS plus 77

81%

Sava Eskimo HP2

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

71%

Comfort & Noise

82%

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

76%

Sava

Eskimo HP2

92%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

Noise Exterior

Uniroyal MS plus 77

84%

Sava Eskimo HP2

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

Ride Comfort

Uniroyal MS plus 77

79%

Sava Eskimo HP2

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

95%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

Economy

78%

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

80%

Sava

Eskimo HP2

83%

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

86%

Bridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

Rolling Resistance

Uniroyal MS plus 77

87%

Sava Eskimo HP2

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

92%

Mileage

Uniroyal MS plus 77

68%

Sava Eskimo HP2

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

Tests used in comparison

Organization	Season	Year	Dimension
Autobild	Winter	2019	225/45 R17	View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Comparison: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

MS plus 77

Eskimo HP2

UltraGrip Performance+

Blizzak LM-005

Test Profile

Performance comparison

Tests used in comparison

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison