18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Test Profile

Uniroyal
MS plus 77
Sava
Eskimo HP2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Number of tests
19
15
24
49
Best position
#3
#6
#1
#1
Average position
11.2
15.5
2.7
3.2
Latest test
2021
2025
2025
2024
Available sizes
76
28
302
213

Wet

Wet
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Sava Eskimo HP2
63%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Wet handling
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
Sava Eskimo HP2
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Wet braking
Uniroyal MS plus 77
72%
Sava Eskimo HP2
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Aquaplaning - cross
Uniroyal MS plus 77
79%
Sava Eskimo HP2
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Wet circle cornering
Uniroyal MS plus 77
74%
Sava Eskimo HP2
59%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Uniroyal MS plus 77
83%
Sava Eskimo HP2
63%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Wet performance
Uniroyal MS plus 77
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%

Snow

Snow
Uniroyal MS plus 77
81%
Sava Eskimo HP2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Snow handling
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Sava Eskimo HP2
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
62%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
72%
Snow traction
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Sava Eskimo HP2
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Snow braking
Uniroyal MS plus 77
84%
Sava Eskimo HP2
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Snow cornering
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Sava Eskimo HP2
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
Snow performance
Uniroyal MS plus 77
80%
Sava Eskimo HP2
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%

Costs

Costs
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Sava Eskimo HP2
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Mileage
Uniroyal MS plus 77
67%
Sava Eskimo HP2
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Rolling resistance
Uniroyal MS plus 77
82%
Sava Eskimo HP2
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Price/value
Uniroyal MS plus 77
75%
Sava Eskimo HP2
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
Fuel efficiency
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Sava Eskimo HP2
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%

Comfort

Comfort
Uniroyal MS plus 77
73%
Sava Eskimo HP2
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Exterior noise
Uniroyal MS plus 77
77%
Sava Eskimo HP2
62%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Comfort
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
Sava Eskimo HP2
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Interior noise
Uniroyal MS plus 77
71%
Sava Eskimo HP2
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%

Dry

Dry
Uniroyal MS plus 77
74%
Sava Eskimo HP2
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Dry braking
Uniroyal MS plus 77
71%
Sava Eskimo HP2
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Dry handling
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
Sava Eskimo HP2
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%

Ice

Ice
Uniroyal MS plus 77
75%
Sava Eskimo HP2
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Ice lateral guidance
Uniroyal MS plus 77
78%
Sava Eskimo HP2
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Ice braking
Uniroyal MS plus 77
73%
Sava Eskimo HP2
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison