Comparison: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Upper-middle

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

R13 – R19

VS

Premium

Goodyear

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

MS plus 77

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Turanza T005

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Number of tests

19

18

33

3

1

Best position

#3

#1

#2

#1

Average position

11.2

6.1

4.1

3.7

1.0

Latest test

2021

2024

2025

Available sizes

76

47

658

34

64

Wet

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

82%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Wet circle cornering

Uniroyal MS plus 77

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

85%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Uniroyal MS plus 77

83%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

78%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Wet handling

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

87%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Wet braking

Uniroyal MS plus 77

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Aquaplaning - cross

Uniroyal MS plus 77

79%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Snow

Uniroyal MS plus 77

81%

Snow handling

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

Snow traction

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

Snow braking

Uniroyal MS plus 77

84%

Snow cornering

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

Costs

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

81%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Mileage

Uniroyal MS plus 77

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

69%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Rolling resistance

Uniroyal MS plus 77

82%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

93%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Price/value

Uniroyal MS plus 77

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

97%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

53%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Fuel efficiency

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

86%

Comfort

Uniroyal MS plus 77

73%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

76%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

62%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Comfort

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

90%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

66%

Interior noise

Uniroyal MS plus 77

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

71%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

83%

Dry

Uniroyal MS plus 77

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry braking

Uniroyal MS plus 77

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

87%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Dry handling

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

87%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Ice

Uniroyal MS plus 77

75%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

MS plus 77

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Turanza T005

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Costs

Comfort

Dry

Ice

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison