Comparison: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Upper-middle

Uniroyal

MS plus 77

R13 – R19

VS

Premium

Bridgestone

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

MS plus 77

Blizzak LM-001

WinterContact TS 860

WinterCraft WP52+

Number of tests

19

15

23

3

Best position

#3

#4

#1

#4

Average position

11.2

7.9

2.3

4.3

Latest test

2021

2018

2021

2025

Available sizes

76

132

76

97

Wet

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

79%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

92%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

Wet braking

Uniroyal MS plus 77

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

62%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

89%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Aquaplaning - cross

Uniroyal MS plus 77

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

85%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

Wet circle cornering

Uniroyal MS plus 77

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

67%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

90%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Uniroyal MS plus 77

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

87%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

90%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Wet handling

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

94%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Wet performance

Uniroyal MS plus 77

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

81%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

91%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

82%

Snow

Uniroyal MS plus 77

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

91%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Snow braking

Uniroyal MS plus 77

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

88%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

90%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

80%

Snow handling

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

87%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Snow traction

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

78%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

88%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

76%

Snow cornering

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

93%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Snow performance

Uniroyal MS plus 77

80%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

88%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

88%

Costs

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

79%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

Mileage

Uniroyal MS plus 77

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

76%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Rolling resistance

Uniroyal MS plus 77

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

78%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

82%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Price/value

Uniroyal MS plus 77

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

70%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

68%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Fuel efficiency

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

79%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

87%

Comfort

Uniroyal MS plus 77

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

50%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

79%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Exterior noise

Uniroyal MS plus 77

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

75%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

80%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Comfort

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

90%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

68%

Interior noise

Uniroyal MS plus 77

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

33%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

77%

Dry

Uniroyal MS plus 77

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

82%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

84%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Dry braking

Uniroyal MS plus 77

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

82%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Dry handling

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

77%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

91%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Ice

Uniroyal MS plus 77

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

80%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

80%

Ice braking

Uniroyal MS plus 77

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

82%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

82%

Ice lateral guidance

Uniroyal MS plus 77

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

78%

Continental WinterContact TS 860

76%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Uniroyal MS plus 77 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

MS plus 77

Blizzak LM-001

WinterContact TS 860

WinterCraft WP52+

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Costs

Comfort

Dry

Ice

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison