18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Triangle Effexsport TH202 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Triangle
Effexsport TH202
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
2
2
3
Best position
#7
#1
#2
Average position
8.0
1.0
3.7
Latest test
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
35
23
34

Wet

Wet
Triangle Effexsport TH202
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet handling
Triangle Effexsport TH202
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Triangle Effexsport TH202
97%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Triangle Effexsport TH202
93%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Triangle Effexsport TH202
44%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Dry

Dry
Triangle Effexsport TH202
51%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
Triangle Effexsport TH202
55%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry braking
Triangle Effexsport TH202
46%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Triangle Effexsport TH202
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Triangle Effexsport TH202
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Triangle Effexsport TH202
86%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Triangle Effexsport TH202
42%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Triangle Effexsport TH202
42%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison