Comparison: Toyo Proxes CF2 vs. Petlas Imperium PT515 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Upper-middle

Toyo

Proxes CF2

R14 – R18

VS

Budget

Petlas

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Proxes CF2

Imperium PT515

e.Ziex

Roadhawk 2

Number of tests

2

5

3

6

Best position

#8

#13

#2

#3

Average position

17.5

24.0

3.7

4.7

Latest test

2019

2024

2025

2026

Available sizes

74

11

34

146

Wet

Toyo Proxes CF2

76%

Petlas Imperium PT515

54%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Toyo Proxes CF2

78%

Petlas Imperium PT515

71%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Wet braking

Toyo Proxes CF2

88%

Petlas Imperium PT515

55%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

Wet circle cornering

Toyo Proxes CF2

72%

Petlas Imperium PT515

60%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

Aquaplaning - cross

Toyo Proxes CF2

67%

Petlas Imperium PT515

66%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Wet handling

Toyo Proxes CF2

66%

Petlas Imperium PT515

30%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Comfort

Toyo Proxes CF2

84%

Petlas Imperium PT515

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Exterior noise

Toyo Proxes CF2

74%

Petlas Imperium PT515

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Dry

Toyo Proxes CF2

74%

Petlas Imperium PT515

46%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Costs

Toyo Proxes CF2

74%

Petlas Imperium PT515

72%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Mileage

Toyo Proxes CF2

70%

Petlas Imperium PT515

75%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

38%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Toyo Proxes CF2 vs. Petlas Imperium PT515 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Proxes CF2

Imperium PT515

e.Ziex

Roadhawk 2

Test Profile

Wet

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison