Comparison: Toyo Proxes CF2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Upper-middle

Toyo

Proxes CF2

R14 – R18

VS

Premium

Michelin

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Proxes CF2

e.Primacy

P ZERO PZ4

UltraContact NXT

Number of tests

2

4

14

2

Best position

#8

#3

#2

#1

Average position

17.5

12.0

5.5

1.0

Latest test

2019

2025

Available sizes

74

111

706

23

Wet

Toyo Proxes CF2

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Aquaplaning - cross

Toyo Proxes CF2

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

68%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Wet handling

Toyo Proxes CF2

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

90%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Toyo Proxes CF2

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

76%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Wet braking

Toyo Proxes CF2

88%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Wet circle cornering

Toyo Proxes CF2

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

89%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Comfort

Toyo Proxes CF2

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Exterior noise

Toyo Proxes CF2

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Costs

Toyo Proxes CF2

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

52%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Dry

Toyo Proxes CF2

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Toyo Proxes CF2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Proxes CF2

e.Primacy

P ZERO PZ4

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Wet

Comfort

Costs

Dry

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison