Comparison: Toyo Proxes CF2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Upper-middle

Toyo

Proxes CF2

R14 – R18

VS

Premium

Michelin

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Test Profile

Proxes CF2

e.Primacy

e.Ziex

UltraContact NXT

Number of tests

2

4

3

2

Best position

#8

#3

#2

#1

Average position

17.5

12.0

3.7

1.0

Latest test

2019

2025

Available sizes

74

111

34

23

Wet

Toyo Proxes CF2

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Toyo Proxes CF2

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Wet braking

Toyo Proxes CF2

88%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Wet circle cornering

Toyo Proxes CF2

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Aquaplaning - cross

Toyo Proxes CF2

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Wet handling

Toyo Proxes CF2

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Comfort

Toyo Proxes CF2

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Exterior noise

Toyo Proxes CF2

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Dry

Toyo Proxes CF2

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Costs

Toyo Proxes CF2

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Toyo Proxes CF2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Proxes CF2

e.Primacy

e.Ziex

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Wet

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison