Comparison: Toyo Proxes CF2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

Toyo

Proxes CF2

R14 – R18

VS

Premium

Michelin

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Test Profile

Proxes CF2

e.Primacy

UltraContact NXT

e.Ziex

Number of tests

2

4

2

3

Best position

#8

#3

#1

#2

Average position

17.5

12.0

1.0

3.7

Latest test

2019

2025

Available sizes

74

111

23

34

Wet

Toyo Proxes CF2

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet circle cornering

Toyo Proxes CF2

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Aquaplaning - cross

Toyo Proxes CF2

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet handling

Toyo Proxes CF2

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Toyo Proxes CF2

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

Toyo Proxes CF2

88%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Comfort

Toyo Proxes CF2

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Toyo Proxes CF2

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Costs

Toyo Proxes CF2

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Dry

Toyo Proxes CF2

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Toyo Proxes CF2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Falken e.Ziex

Proxes CF2

e.Primacy

UltraContact NXT

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Comfort

Costs

Dry

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison